Falco cherrug [Russian Federation]

Stage
Recommendations
Decisions

Decide appropriate action and make recommendations to State/all Parties-S

Meeting	Currrent Concern: Urgent Concern
Date Started	Deadline Date

Completed	Completed Date

Comments

Comment	Date Added	Access	User
SC59 Doc. 14.1: None of the eight range States concerned (the Islamic Republic of Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) has provided this information to the Secretariat or expressed a wish to resume authorizing exports of wild specimens of F. cherrug. d) The Secretariat, in consultation with the Chair of the Animals Committee, proposes that the Standing Committee should therefore close this matter by including a zero export quota for wild specimens of F. cherrug from the States named in subparagraph c) in the export quota list on the CITES website. It is the view of the Chair of the Animals Committee that should any of these States subsequently wish to resume export of wild taken specimens of this species they should advise the Secretariat of the measures they have taken to comply with the recommendations in sub-paragraph c) above and the Secretariat shall, in consultation with the Chair of the Animals Committee, determine whether the recommendations have been implemented and report to the Standing Committee accordingly.	13/03/2015	Public Viewer	Elena

No Document!

Back to Specific Review

Links

CITES Trade Database
CITES Identification Manual
CITES National Contacts

Disclaimer

The CITES Significant Trade Database is updated frequently, but may not be completely up-to-date at any given moment or necessarily error free. This database is intended to be an initial reference source only, and users must verify any information obtained from it with Parties or the CITES Secretariat. The CITES Secretariat is not liable for any damages, in whole or in part, caused by or arising in any way from use of the CITES Significant Trade Database.